Date of Award

6-1-2013

Document Type

Masters Thesis

Degree Name

M.A.

Organizational Unit

Josef Korbel School of International Studies

First Advisor

Erica Chenoweth, Ph.D.

Second Advisor

Ved Nanda

Third Advisor

Barry Hughes

Fourth Advisor

Lindsay Heger

Fifth Advisor

Lewis Griffith

Keywords

Extrapolation model, Insurgency, Power law, Red Queen hypothesis, Terrorism

Abstract

Recent empirical studies suggest insurgencies may be accurately described by aggregated extrapolation models, such that past behavior becomes the best predictor for future action. I argue that aggregated extrapolation models possess two flaws that make it a poor choice for examining insurgencies. First, aggregated extrapolation models ask the wrong question. The more interesting question is to ask when present action is no longer explainable by past behavior. Secondly, aggregate models mask changes that a phenomenon undergoes over time which are only revealed upon disaggregating the data. Starting with a model and findings provided by Neil Johnson, I use casualty data from the Iraq War to offer an alternative method to identify changes in the phenomenon under observation with the addition of no new data. Presenting an alternate set of findings, I propose it is possible to identify ‘game changer’ events with the introduction of breakpoints to observe for distinct departures from the baseline trajectory

Publication Statement

Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.

Rights Holder

Micah Dolcort-Silver

Provenance

Received from ProQuest

File Format

application/pdf

Language

en

File Size

110 p.

Discipline

International relations



Share

COinS