Date of Award

1-1-2010

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

M.A.

Department

Conflict Resolution Institute

First Advisor

Karen Feste

Second Advisor

Joe Szyliowicz

Keywords

9/11, Al Qaeda, Grievances, Osama Bin Laden, Terrorism, USS Cole

Abstract

This study analyzes how the United States responds to Al Qaeda's messages and expressions of grievances and how America's responses escalate the conflict between the United States and Al Qaeda.

After its first two attacks against America, Al Qaeda devised a strategy to draw America into a guerrilla war in Afghanistan, stating its intentions in its "Declaration of War" in 1996. Before this declaration, Al Qaeda worked from the shadows and denied reports it was either funding terrorism or participating in terrorism. Bin Laden continued his denials but took responsibility for some terrorist acts in his messages. President Clinton did not mention Osama bin Laden's name until the two US Embassy bombings in East Africa, which was the only terrorist act to which President Clinton responded militarily. Al Qaeda escalated its rhetoric and violent actions with each successive message and attack. After the September 11th attacks, Al Qaeda changed its rhetoric by offering peace overtures to the United States and its allies. Osama bin Laden continued his peace overtures throughout President Bush's two terms in office and into President Obama's first year. The peace overtures are discounted by both President Bush and President Obama, who say that Al Qaeda is not an organization that will negotiate peace. The rhetoric from Al Qaeda is that the long war will continue as long as the United States continues to occupy Arab and Muslim land, which is their primary grievance against America and its allies.

Provenance

Recieved from ProQuest

Rights holder

Richard Craig Rosthauser

File size

206 p.

File format

application/pdf

Language

en

Discipline

American history, International relations, Political Science

Share

COinS