Date of Award


Document Type


Degree Name



Graduate School of Professional Psychology

First Advisor

Michael Karson

First Committee Member

Bridget Engel

Second Committee Member

William Gowensmith


Intercultural communication, Cultural competence, Clinical psychology, Forensic psychology

Publication Statement

Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.


While working in clinical and forensic psychology settings, a communication difficulty between the two professions became apparent. Forensic psychologists often appeared cold and callous from the clinical psychologist’s perspective, while clinical psychologists often appeared naïve or too client centered from the forensic psychologist’s perspective. I wondered if viewing each subfield of psychology as a culture could facilitate better communication through intercultural communication. Guided by Intercultural Communication in Contexts (Martin & Nakayama, 2010) in approaching intercultural communication between the two professions, I explored factors contributing to each profession’s cultural identities. Once this was established, I attempted to explore the different ways each culture could communicate more effectively. By recognizing and utilizing the strengths from each profession and understanding the possible pitfalls of one’s own, we may become competent in intercultural communication


24 pages

Included in

Psychology Commons