Abstract
This paper asks: How and why is Generation Z more vulnerable to AI-generated misinformation and disinformation than older generations? Using a comparative review of recent empirical studies, survey data, and meta-analyses from 2019–2025, this paper synthesizes research on Gen Z’s exposure to and interaction with AI-produced content across social media platforms. Although it is commonly assumed that Gen Z ’s technological exposure and fluency make them better equipped to recognize false information, findings show the opposite: Gen Z is consistently outperformed by older cohorts in detecting AI-generated falsehoods. This vulnerability stems from three intersecting factors: (1) the sheer volume of AI-produced content in their online environments; (2) developmental and cognitive traits that heighten surface-level engagement rather than analytical processing; and (3) algorithmic personalization that amplifies emotionally engaging but misleading material. Despite these risks, interventions such as prebunking and targeted media-literacy training demonstrate measurable success in improving discernment and reducing belief in AI-generated falsehoods. The paper concludes that Gen Z’s challenge is not lack of access or awareness, but overexposure to AI-mediated information ecosystems that exploit attention and trust. Understanding and addressing this generational vulnerability is crucial for strengthening democratic resilience and developing evidence-based education and policy responses in an increasingly digital era.
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse

All Rights Reserved.
Recommended Citation
Cooley, Cecilia and Sperber, Elizabeth
(2026)
"Generation Z and the AI Misinformation Paradox: Understanding a New Digital Vulnerability,"
DU Undergraduate Research Journal Archive: Vol. 7:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
Publication Statement
Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Included in
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons, Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Information Literacy Commons, Other Communication Commons, Science and Technology Policy Commons