Date of Award
1-1-2009
Document Type
Masters Thesis
Degree Name
M.A.
Organizational Unit
College of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, Conflict Resolution
First Advisor
Richard Clemmer-Smith, Ph.D.
Second Advisor
Tamra Pearson d'Estree, Ph.D.
Third Advisor
Christina Kreps
Fourth Advisor
Christopher Teuton
Keywords
Indigenous sovereignty, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, United Nations, Indigenous groups
Abstract
Using the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, this study was designed to understand how indigenous groups assert their sovereign rights in conflict situations, and how they can be most successful in doing so.
Two instances of indigenous-state conflict were analyzed and compared both to each other and to a baseline of what sovereignty in conflict is, based on the United Nations Declaration. Data to be analyzed and compared was gathered through extensive archival research and interviews with tribal members and other interested parties.
The results documented the interaction between indigenous groups and state/provincial and federal governments in conflict, and suggested that indigenous groups should assert their sovereignty both in the courts, for long-term success, and using other methods to build a power base that will contribute to short-term success. The data also suggests that key components necessary for indigenous groups in general to assert sovereignty in conflict situations include a united front with strong leadership and no corruption; having enough strength to gain attention and assert sovereignty; a continuous assertion of sovereignty through action; and an ability to see beyond the legal paradigm in using other methods either alone or in conjunction with appealing to the courts. These conclusions lead to suggestions for ways that indigenous groups can improve their assertion of sovereignty in conflict situations. The study itself also gives a guide to those engaged in similar situations as to how sovereignty can be better respected in resolution processes and outcomes.
Publication Statement
Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Rights Holder
Christina Farnsworth
Provenance
Received from ProQuest
File Format
application/pdf
Language
en
File Size
188 p.
Recommended Citation
Farnsworth, Christina, "Indigenous Sovereignty in State-Native Conflicts: A Comparative Study of Process and Outcomes" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 806.
https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/806
Copyright date
2009
Discipline
Cultural anthropology, Native American studies