Abstract
The predecessor to the Human Rights Council, the Commission on Human Rights, had several notable failings. These included double standards in the selection of which states were to be subject to scrutiny, membership of the Commission by states notable for their egregious human rights records, and the shielding of the P5 members of the Security Council and their allies from criticism. The Human Rights Council, it was hoped, would avoid these flaws and, in doing so, push human rights further up the UN agenda. For instance, the General Assembly Resolution A/RES/60/251, which set up the Council, claimed that the Council’s work “shall be guided by the principles of universality, impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity, constructive international dialogue and cooperation, with a view to enhancing the promotion and protection of all human rights”.
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse
All Rights Reserved.
Publication Statement
Copyright is held by the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Recommended Citation
Pattison, James
(2010)
"Human Rights Abusers, the Human Rights Council, and the UN,"
Human Rights & Human Welfare: Vol. 10:
Iss.
7, Article 5.
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.du.edu/hrhw/vol10/iss7/5
Included in
Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons