With the UN High Commissioner for Refugees announcing early this year that the war in Syria may have claimed as many as 60,000 lives, two op-eds published late in 2012 usefully exemplify two contrasting frames that have thus far dominated international responses to the conflict—namely, the humanitarian frame and the geopolitical frame. Yet despite the apparent contrasts between these two frameworks, both reflect a similar contempt for the Syrian people and their right to self-determination. The humanitarian framing of the conflict emphasizes the scale of human suffering and the need to alleviate it, while the geopolitical frame accentuates political interests and international rivalries. Neither one prioritizes the needs and interests of the Syrian people. Let us review the two approaches in more depth.
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse
All Rights Reserved.
Copyright is held by the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
"Syrians Crushed Between Humanitarianism and Realism,"
Human Rights & Human Welfare: Vol. 13:
1, Article 2.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/hrhw/vol13/iss1/2
Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons