Title
A Commentary on Chen and Campbell (2017): Is There a Clear Case for Addition Fact Recall?
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-5-2018
Organizational Units
College of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, Psychology
Abstract
In their review of Uittenhove, Thevenot and Barrouillet (Cognition, 146, 289–303, 2016), Chen and Campbell (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017 https://doi-org.du.idm.oclc.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1328-2) concluded that existing evidence supports the conventional wisdom that basic non-zero addition combinations are stored and retrieved as discrete facts and that compacted reconstructive strategies play no role in expert mental addition. One aim of the present commentary is to detail why their evidence supporting these conclusions is not unequivocal. A second aim is to delineate key issues that still need to be addressed to build an accurate model of how basic sums are represented and retrieved.
Compass Link
https://du-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1jii0mc/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2011275190
Publication Statement
Copyright held by author or publisher. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Recommended Citation
Baroody, A. J. (2018). A commentary on Chen and Campbell (2017): Is there a clear case for addition fact recall? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(6), 2398-2405. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1440-y.