Date of Award

Summer 8-23-2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph.D. in Quantitative Research Methods

Organizational Unit

Morgridge College of Education, Research Methods and Information Science, Research Methods and Statistics

First Advisor

Yixiao Dong

Second Advisor

Robyn Thomas Pitts

Third Advisor

Keiko McCullough

Fourth Advisor

Inna Altschul

Copyright Statement / License for Reuse

All Rights Reserved
All Rights Reserved.

Keywords

Causal relationships, Methodological pluralism, Ordinary least squares (OLS), Quantile regression (QR), Linear relationships

Abstract

Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression has traditionally been the preferred quantitative method for estimating linear relationships. However, it assumes that the effect of a predictor variable remains constant across the entire outcome distribution, which can miss important insights when data are heterogeneous. Quantile Regression (QR), on the other hand, offers a more detailed analysis by focusing on the full response variable distribution, thereby revealing different relationship patterns at various quantiles within the outcome. This study compares how OLS and QR perform in modeling conditional relationships within a causal-comparative framework based on ex post facto research. Using the mortality data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, this research applies both OLS and QR to examine how age influences weekly deaths across the entire range, not just at the mean. The results show clear differences between the two methods. OLS identifies the overall average effect of age but overlooks significant variations across the distribution of weekly deaths. QR, however, uncovers distinct patterns by analyzing the relationship at different quantiles. This emphasizes the importance of choosing modeling techniques that align with research goals and data characteristics. Consequently, this study recommends using QR alongside traditional regression methods in social science research, demonstrating how each captures variability differently. Overall, it advocates for methodological pluralism, which is essential for understanding complex causal relationships in intricate datasets.

Copyright Date

8-2025

Publication Statement

Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.

Rights Holder

Samuel Nnorom

Provenance

Received from ProQuest

File Format

application/pdf

Language

English (eng)

Extent

164 pgs

File Size

1.3 MB



Share

COinS