Date of Award
Summer 8-22-2026
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Ph.D. in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
Organizational Unit
Morgridge College of Education, Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
First Advisor
Kristina Hesbol
Second Advisor
Carrie Sampson
Third Advisor
Brette Garner
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse

All Rights Reserved.
Keywords
Critical policy analysis, School boards, Student board members, Student voice
Abstract
The aim of this study was to critically examine student voice in school boards, specifically how student representation is enacted, negotiated, or constrained in public school board meetings across multiple states. This study used a critical political analysis, multi-site, multi-year case study, as I wanted to showcase the different forms of student board memberships and the enactment of policy. In total, three school years of public regular board meetings were observed across three different school districts. The study employed a critical policy analysis to examine state statutes, district bylaws, board policies, meeting recordings, agendas, minutes, and transcripts.
I examined variations between the different policies and the roles of student board members and the reality of their roles through the observation of public school board meetings. I also explored what the discourse revealed about the power, legitimacy, and position of student board members. I highlighted four findings as central to understanding how student representation functions in educational governance: student power was only granted as far as policy allowed; student voice was welcomed, but adult governance structures controlled the terms of participation; student voice revealed shared policy problems across governance contexts, including safety, mental health, representation, belonging, and communication; and student voice exceeded the formal student board member position.
This study offers recommendations for ways policymakers, district leaders, and school boards should strengthen policy language, provide training for both student and adult board members, create structures for student input, and support membership in student board associations to move student representation from symbolic participation toward shared governance.
Copyright Date
8-2026
Publication Statement
Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Rights Holder
Reina M. Cruz
Provenance
Received from ProQuest
File Format
application/pdf
Language
English (eng)
Extent
169 pgs
File Size
1.8 MB
Recommended Citation
Cruz, Reina M., "Critical Policy Analysis of Student School Board Members: From Symbolic Seats to Shared Power" (2026). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2763.
https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/2763
Included in
Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, Educational Leadership Commons, Education Policy Commons