Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2005

Keywords

Ballot initiative, Preemption, Medical marijuana

Organizational Units

Sturm College of Law

Abstract

As with the political reform initiatives, this second type of ballot initiative represents a category for which the initiative process is especially appropriate: issues requiring experimentation in the area of health, traditionally a topic of strong concern at the state level. Furthermore, this category of initiative does not suffer from the ills that detractors note in other contexts. These initiatives expand personal rights and do not infringe on others' rights, and they address elemental issues, so citizens can be sufficiently informed to cast votes representing their convictions. These types of initiatives, however, confront a significant problem. They frequently involve areas of law already subject to preexisting federal regulation. Under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, federal law preempts conflicting state laws." To the extent these ballot initiatives conflict with federal legislation, they are preempted, and the social experiment comes to an end.

Publication Statement

Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.



Share

COinS