Publication Date


Document Type


Organizational Units

Sturm College of Law


Unpublished decisions, Precedence


The practice of unpublished decisions and their precedential value causes much controversy. The practice of unpublished opinions creates a solution for how to deal effectively with heavy caseloads. Electronic databases make unpublished decisions readily available, which removes any secrecy that critics fear. Unpublished opinions are treated in one of three ways by the courts. In addition, three pragmatic issues are created by allowing opinions to go unpublished: 1) the availability of these decisions, 2) the quality of the reasoning in unpublished decisions, and 3) the treatment of unpublished opinions as precedent.

Publication Statement

Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance. Published by the Journal of Appellate Practice & Process, archival issues available at: