Publication Date
11-24-2016
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
Right to roam laws, Right to exclude
Abstract
The concepts of exclusion and access occupy the minds of many property scholars. We regularly debate the problems with, and benefits of, exclusion. We talk about how foundational the right to exclude is, and should be. We talk about whether and when the right to exclude should bend to accommodate other interests. And we talk about the value of exclusion. While these debates have filled many pages in law journals and hours of panel discussions, Professors Jonathan Klick and Gideon Parchomovsky noticed that something was missing from the discourse: empirical evidence.
Publication Statement
Originally published as Sarah B. Schindler, Access, Exclusion, and Value, JOTWELL (Nov. 25, 2016), https://property.jotwell.com/access-exclusion-and-value/ (reviewing Johnathan Klick & Gideon Parchomovsky, The Value of the Right to Exclude: An Empirical Assessment, 165 Univ. Pa. L. Rev. 917 (2016)).
Rights Holder
Sarah Schindler
Provenance
Received from author
File Format
application/pdf
Language
English (eng)
Extent
2 pgs
File Size
57 KB
Publication Title
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Volume
165
First Page
1
Last Page
2
Recommended Citation
Sarah B. Schindler, Access, Exclusion, and Value, JOTWELL (Nov. 25, 2016), https://property.jotwell.com/access-exclusion-and-value/ (reviewing Johnathan Klick & Gideon Parchomovsky, The Value of the Right to Exclude: An Empirical Assessment, 165 Univ. Pa. L. Rev. 917 (2016)).