Date of Award
Fall 11-21-2025
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Ph.D. in Religious Studies
Organizational Unit
Joint Ph.D. Program in Study of Religion, Religious Studies
First Advisor
Andrea Stanton
Second Advisor
Joshua Hanan
Third Advisor
Mark George
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse

All Rights Reserved.
Keywords
Arabic, Contingency, Discourse analysis, Political theology
Abstract
Contributing to the field of political theology from outside the European Christian tradition, this dissertation develops a description of the distinct logics that Islamic theology generates from its metaphysical assumptions. These logics in turn make possible a discourse of political anti-theology where politics operates through contingency rather than sovereignty. Political theology scholarship has excavated how modern politics derives from secularized Christian theological concepts—particularly transcendent sovereignty. This study demonstrates that Islamic theology's absolute insistence on divine transcendence (tawhid) produces something fundamentally different: a politics that renders sovereign authority conceptually impossible. I identify this discursive practice of political anti-theology through careful reading of the original texts of the earliest epistemological controversies in Islamic thought, and the epochal Islamic thinker of the eleventh-century CE, al-Ghazali's elaboration of their resolution. This rationality understands knowledge to emerge from the dialectical interaction between subjective perspectives and material circumstances rather than from transcendent objective principles. Politics that emerges from within this rationality is necessarily contingent and plural. This anti-theological politics manifested institutionally in premodern Islamic societies through systems like the madhhab legal culture (competing but mutually valid schools of law), and continues to appear in contemporary Islamic political discourse. Through sustained comparison with Western political theology—engaging particularly with Giorgio Agamben's archaeology of Western Christian political theology, I show how Islamic political anti-theology avoids recursively recreating sovereign authority. Ultimately, Islamic political anti-theology offers a historically attested conceptual resource for thinking politics beyond the transcendent authority that political theology scholarship struggles to think beyond.
Copyright Date
11-2025
Publication Statement
Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Rights Holder
Jason Andrus
Provenance
Received from ProQuest
File Format
application/pdf
Language
English (eng)
Extent
255 pgs
File Size
1 MB
Recommended Citation
Andrus, Jason, "Islamic Political Anti-Theology: A Discursive Practice of Contingency Beyond Sovereign Politics" (2025). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2666.
https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/2666
Included in
Islamic Studies Commons, Religion Law Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, Sociology of Religion Commons