Publication Date

2015

Document Type

Article

Organizational Units

Sturm College of Law

Keywords

Clinical legal education, Experiential learning, Simulation model

Abstract

This article offers in Part I the major sources for a possible new definition of experiential learning, and describes the limitations of the definitional elements that we currently have. Part II argues that the definitions we currently have are not only limited but their limitations are being further exposed by the growth and variety in experiential learning opportunities currently being offered in many law schools. Part III offers a new definition for experiential learning in law, together with a series of questions that can be used in applying the definition. Finally, Part IV offers application of the new definition to examples of course work that are currently being offered in law schools around the country, so that the reader can see the definition at work.

Rights Holder

David I.C. Thomson

Provenance

Received from author

File Format

application/pdf

Language

English (eng)

Extent

31

File Size

1.8 MB

Publication Statement

Originally published as David I.C. Thomson, Defining Experiential Legal Education, 1 J. EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING 1 (2015). Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.

Publication Title

J. EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

Volume

1

First Page

1

Last Page

31



Share

COinS