Publication Date
11-1-1996
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
Empirical, Empiricism, Property, Hohfeld, Blackstone, Warranty, Estates in land, Quantitative, Legal history, History, Slavery, Slave, Slave auctions, Auctions, Ideology, Sheriffs, Chancery, South Carolina, Antebellum, Trial courts, Black Lives Matter, BLM, Slave, Ideology
Abstract
This legal history article presents a new understanding of the nature of slave property. Slave property was divided and fragmented into many different interests including those with application to real property such life estates, remainders, shifting and spring interests, and leasehold interests. With regard to these interests, the article overlays the first-year, law-school property course onto slaves as property. Property interests in slaves were also divided by credit mechanisms including mortgages and secured credit transactions. Warranties are another example of divided property interests in slaves.
The fragmented, Hohfeldian nature of slave property distributed the stake that southerners had in the institution of slavery.
The article also places this new image of slave property onto the steps of courthouses. Court-ordered and court-supervised sales offered bargain opportunities for southerners to purchase slaves, thereby further extending the investment of southern society in slave property. This article builds upon the author’s earlier findings that a majority of slave auctions in South Carolina were conducted by the courts and that when courts sold slaves, the risk of family separation was higher than when private sellers conducted the sales. The data for this article and the previous study were drawn from antebellum primary sources including trial-court records, the salesbooks of sheriffs, and records of masters in chancery.
Presented at Symposium entitled "Bondage, Freedom, and the Constitution: The New Slavery Scholarship and its Impact on Law and Legal Historiography, February 1994
Publication Statement
Copyright held by the authors. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Originally published as Thomas B. Russell, A New Image of the Slave Auction: An Empirical Look at the Role of Law in Slave Sales and a Conceptual Reevaluation of the Nature of Slave Property, 18 Cardozo Law Review 473 (November 1996).
Recommended Citation
Thomas B. Russell, A New Image of the Slave Auction: An Empirical Look at the Role of Law in Slave Sales and a Conceptual Reevaluation of the Nature of Slave Property, 18 Cardozo Law Review 473 (November 1996).