Publication Date
9-1-2006
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
Legal writing, Audience
Abstract
This is the final column in a series addressing reader expectations for objective legal writing. In the January 2006 Scrivener, I posted three samples of objective legal writing and asked readers to give me feedback through an online survey about which they preferreda nd why. The May and July columns provided analysis of reader responses to introductory and rule explanation paragraphs. This column reports on reader reactions as to what many lawyers would argue is the most important part of a legal analysis: application of the legal rule to a client's facts.
Publication Statement
Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Recommended Citation
K.K. DuVivier, “Beholder” Reflections—Part III, 35 Colo. Law. 99 (Sept. 2006).