Publication Date
2022
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
Age, COVID, Government benefits, Discrimination
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic brought debates over the use of age in scarce resource allocation to the fore once again. Initially, particularly in developed countries, debates surrounded the use of older age as an exclusion or lower-priority criterion for receipt of scarce medical interventions such as ICU beds and ventilator therapy. Many advocacy groups for older adults argued that age should not be used as a criterion for access to such interventions.[1] In developed countries and in particular the United States, they were largely successful, at least with respect to formal policy, ensuring that resource allocation policies excluded or minimized the role of age-based prioritization that might work to the disadvantage of older adults. Some of these groups argued that the use of age would constitute “unlawful age discrimination.
Copyright Date
2022
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse
All Rights Reserved.
File Format
application/pdf
Publication Statement
User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Publication Title
SMU Law Review Forum
Recommended Citation
Govind Persad, Equal Protection and Scarce Therapies: The Role of Race, Sex, and Other Protected Classifications, 75 SMU L. Rev. F. 226 (2022).
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons