Age-Based Vaccine Distribution Is Not Only Unethical. It’s Also Bad Health Policy.
Publication Date
3-9-2021
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
Vaccines, Bioethics, Public health, Health policy
Abstract
Americans are queuing up for coronavirus vaccinations, but some states have started pushing vulnerable residents out of the vaccine line. Maine removed eligibility for all front-line workers and people with high-risk medical conditions, instead basing vaccine access solely on age. (It later restored eligibility for teachers, following the Biden administration's announcement that it would prioritize them.) Other states, such as Connecticut and Nebraska, have made similar age-focused changes. In Maine and Connecticut, a healthy 50-year-old working from home will be eligible for vaccination, while a 44-year-old front-line worker with diabetes living in a hard-hit community will be turned away.
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse
All Rights Reserved.
Publication Statement
User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Recommended Citation
Govind Persad, Emily A. Largent & Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Opinion, Age-Based Vaccine Distribution Is Not Only Unethical. It’s Also Bad Health Policy., Wash. Post (Mar. 9, 2021), https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/09/age-based-covid-vaccine-distribution-unethical/.