Publication Date
1-1-2009
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
World Trade Organization (WTO), Geneva, Subsidies, Corn subsidies, Ethanol subsidies, International trade law, Agreiculture, WTO agreements, Upland Cotton, Commodity subsidy programs, Denatured alcohol, Antidumping duties, Commercial treaties, Alcohol, Agricultural subsidies, Corn products, Corn, International trade, Subsidies, Ethanol, International law, Prices, Negotiation, Rationing, United States, Agriculture and state, Protectionism, Food
Abstract
Everyone should care about what happens at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Geneva. This Article argues that new challenges to US corn and ethanol subsidies are highly likely. Even though at first glance this Article deals with the specialized and esoteric field of international trade law, its sweep is much broader. The subject of this Article is also both timely and salient. Part I explains the multi-layered WTO regime on agriculture and subsidies, with particular emphasis on the delicate interplay among multiple WTO agreements. Part II discusses the Upland Cotton case in detail, highlighting in particular the implications for other US commodity subsidy programs, including corn. Part III examines the legal and political likelihood of a new WTO challenge against US corn and ethanol subsidies and suggests that such a challenge is highly probable. Part IV analyzes the significance of the Upland Cotton Case.
Rights Holder
Phoenix X.F. Cai, Georgetown Journal of International Law
File Format
application/pdf
Language
English (eng)
Extent
53 pgs
File Size
3.1 MB
Publication Statement
Copyright held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
Publication Title
Georgetown Journal of International Law
Volume
40
Issue
3
First Page
865
Last Page
917
Recommended Citation
Phoenix X.F. Cai, Think Big and Ignore the Law: U.S. Corn and Ethanol Subsidies and WTO Law, 40 Geo. J. Int’l L. 865 (2009).
Included in
International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Relations Commons, International Trade Law Commons