Publication Date
7-1-1999
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
Sprint, La Conexion Familiar, Expert testimony, Dialogue, Latina, Latino, Chicana, Chicano, Puerto Rico
Abstract
I was asked to be an expert witness for Sprint Corporation in December 1995. I found out that the hearing was being held by the U.S. National Administrative Office because a Mexican labor union had filed a complaint pursuant to the NAFTA labor side accord. I prepared my testimony, I attended the hearing in San Francisco and testified. I began to realize the gravity of my mistake, however, when I sat down and listened to the testimony of the person who spoke after me. Her name was Dora Vogel. She was one of the Latinas who had been employed at La Conexion Familiar and she testified in Spanish.
My testifying was a mistake, but it did not change my leanings or my sensitivities. And, although it was inconsistent with who I am, it should not, but probably will, change perceptions about me. My deciding to testify came as a result of both emotional and intellectual errors in essentializing and not essentializing, mistakes that could only have been corrected by interrogating myself at a deeper level of thought and emotion.
I also think American law can often be too hypertechnical. There is so much sheer detail in the various legal structures we erect—especially those that are created by statute. International law has often frustrated me because a lot of it, especially public international law, is stated in very vague, general principles. As I learned from testifying in the Sprint/LCF dispute, however, international law can serve as a check on domestic law that is characterized by the hypertechnicality of U.S. law. International law can help to remind us not to lose sight of justice
Rights Holder
Roberto L. Corrada, University of Miami Law Review
File Format
application/pdf
Language
English (eng)
Extent
24 pgs
File Size
1.4 MB
Publication Statement
Copyright held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
This article was originally published as Roberto L. Corrada, Familiar Connections: A Personal Re/View of Latino/a Identity, Gender, and Class Issues in the Context of the Labor Dispute Between Sprint and La Conexion Familiar, 53 U. Miami L. Rev. 1065 (1999).
Volume
53
First Page
1065
Last Page
1088
Recommended Citation
Roberto L. Corrada, Familiar Connections: A Personal Re/View of Latino/a Identity, Gender, and Class Issues in the Context of the Labor Dispute Between Sprint and La Conexion Familiar, 53 U. Miami L. Rev. 1065 (1999).
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Latin American Languages and Societies Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Latina/o Studies Commons