Publication Date
1-1-2000
Document Type
Article
Organizational Units
Sturm College of Law
Keywords
Religion, Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Civil Rights Act, Religious freedom, Mahmoud Abdul Rauof, National Basketball Association, Labor, Employment, Reasonable accommodations, Workplace Religious Freedom Act (WRFA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), First Amendment
Abstract
The religion clauses of the Constitution do not have to stand against one another. Viewed broadly they both encourage tolerance of religious practice and belief, the Establishment Clause by not allowing one religion to occupy a place above all others and the Free Exercise Clause by allowing all religions to flourish. The Workplace Religious Freedom Act does no violence to either clause in attempting to restore religion to its place among other important concerns of government
Rights Holder
Roberto L. Corrada, Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal
File Format
application/pdf
Language
English (eng)
Extent
53 pgs
File Size
17.7 MB
Publication Statement
Copyright held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.
This article was originally published as William P. Marshall et al., Religion in the Workplace: Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools Section on Law and Religion, 4 Emp. Rts. & Emp. Pol'y J. 89 (2000).
Volume
4
First Page
89
Last Page
97
Recommended Citation
William P. Marshall et al., Religion in the Workplace: Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools Section on Law and Religion, 4 Emp. Rts. & Emp. Pol'y J. 89 (2000).
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Commons, Religion Law Commons